Cosmopolitanism starts from the _singular_ individual rather than the _faceless_ collective
Cosmopolitanism starts from the _singular_ individual rather than the _faceless_ collective
No language about God will ever be fully adequate to the burning mystery which it signifies.
I want to affirm that thinking and living, knowing and doing, theory and practice intersect.
History has the relation to truth that theology has to religion — ie., none to speak of
I study theology in the works of creation and find in it new reasons for adoring the creator.
God's revelation in the Gospel not only reveals Who He is, but it also reveals who we are.
Is it faith to understand nothing, and merely submit your convictions implicitly to the Church?
Like apes, we breed, sleep, and die. Yet like God we say, "I am." We are ontological oxymorons.
Isn't that funny, that deity is passe but the attributes and implications of deity linger--
Joy isn't grounded in our circumstances; it is grounded in the unchanging character of God.
And what greater might do we possess as human beings than our capacity to question and to learn?
the cosmopolitan gaze of planetary love and hospitality _is_ what constitutes being _religious_.
Cosmopolitanism emphasizes and is grounded in a _singular relationality between and among people
Worship is forgetting about what's wrong with you and remembering what's right with God.
Take your Bible and take your newspaper, and read both. But interpret newspapers from your Bible.